CAREANDSELFLOVE

Sleeping separately as a couple does not automatically signal rejection, lost attraction, or relationship trouble. For some partners, sharing a bed supports security, intimacy, and even aspects of sleep synchronization. For others, snoring, movement, insomnia, different schedules, temperature preferences, caregiving duties, or sensory sensitivity turn the shared bed into a nightly source of disruption.

The healthiest arrangement is not the one that looks most romantic from the outside. It is the one both people choose freely, review honestly, and support with deliberate connection.

Separate sleep works best when it solves a sleep problem rather than conceals a relationship problem. It should be collaborative, reversible, and paired with affection, communication, and protected time for physical intimacy.

In other words: you can leave the bed without leaving the relationship.

There is a particular kind of relationship rule that survives because almost nobody thinks to question it.

Two people fall in love. They become serious. Eventually, they share a home. Then, as if romance came with an invisible housing contract, they are expected to spend every night in the same bed.

If they do not, people begin writing a story for them.

Something must be wrong. They must have stopped having sex. One of them must be angry. The relationship must be quietly collapsing behind two closed bedroom doors.

But what if the door is closed because one partner starts work at 5:30 a.m.? What if the person on the other side has chronic pain, hot flashes, insomnia, a restless body, a different circadian rhythm, or a nervous system that wakes at the smallest sound? What if both people are more patient, affectionate, playful, and emotionally available after sleeping well?

I think we have confused romantic commitment with mattress attendance.

We have treated the shared bed as proof of love even when the people inside it are exhausted, resentful, and silently counting each other’s snores. We have made nighttime proximity a moral achievement.

It is not.

A bed is not a courtroom where your love is placed on trial each night. It is part of your household infrastructure. It should support the bodies using it.

Sometimes, the most loving sentence in a relationship is not “Stay here.”

It is:

“I want both of us to wake up well.”

The shared bed has become a relationship lie detector

Modern couples are allowed to have separate phones, careers, hobbies, friendships, bank accounts, therapists, desks, and opinions.

Yet separate sleep still makes many people uneasy.

The anxiety is not really about furniture. It is about symbolism.

The shared bed has been asked to represent an extraordinary number of things at once: loyalty, sexual desire, emotional safety, domestic unity, maturity, normality, and proof that the relationship is alive.

When one person suggests a different sleeping arrangement, the other may not hear, “I need deeper sleep.”

They may hear, “I do not want you.”

That interpretation is understandable, especially for someone with a history of abandonment, betrayal, sexual rejection, or unpredictable affection. Research supports the idea that attachment security and relationship experiences can influence sleep. A trusted partner’s presence may help some people feel safe enough to settle.

In a study of 179 cohabiting heterosexual couples, researchers found that attachment security and avoidance were associated with subjective sleep quality. The relationship between time spent in bed together and sleep quality also varied according to attachment characteristics, particularly among women.

This does not mean that someone who prefers shared sleep is needy. It means that the sleeping body is also a social body. For some people, a familiar person nearby communicates safety.

But symbolism becomes dangerous when it erases biology.

A light sleeper does not become a deep sleeper through devotion. A night owl does not stop having a later chronotype because the relationship is serious. A person who overheats cannot negotiate with her thermoregulation at 2:00 a.m. A snore does not become quieter because it is produced by someone beloved.

The question, then, is not simply:

“Do healthy couples sleep together?”

A better question is:

“What does this particular couple need to protect both rest and connection?”

That question is less cinematic.

It is also more adult.

What science actually says about couples and sleep

The evidence does not support a universal command to sleep together or sleep apart.

It supports a more interesting conclusion:

Sleep is relational, but the effects of sharing a bed are highly individual.

A 2025 systematic review and meta-analysis examined 62 studies involving 43,860 participants. The researchers found a moderate association between better couple relationship quality and better overall sleep quality. Better relationship quality was also associated with longer sleep duration.

That finding matters, but it needs to be interpreted carefully.

It does not prove that sleeping in one bed creates a good relationship. It also does not prove that moving into separate rooms damages one. Relationship quality, emotional safety, stress, health, sleep disorders, and sleeping arrangements can all influence one another.

The authors themselves emphasized the need for more long-term research and more studies conducted outside the United States.

There are also genuine benefits to sleeping beside a trusted partner.

In a sleep-laboratory study of young, healthy heterosexual couples, co-sleeping was associated with approximately 10% more relative rapid eye movement sleep, less fragmented REM sleep, longer uninterrupted REM periods, and greater synchronization of sleep stages. At the same time, participants showed more limb movements while sleeping together.

These findings challenge a crude assumption commonly made in sleep discussions: that every movement or brief awakening means shared sleep is objectively bad.

A partner’s presence may provide social and physiological benefits that a simple sleep-efficiency score cannot fully capture. Someone may move more but still feel safer. Someone may experience brief disturbances yet report that sleep feels more comforting or restorative.

However, the opposite pattern also exists.

Bed partners can disturb one another in measurable ways.

In a study of 52 couples in which one partner had diagnosed insomnia, researchers monitored both people’s sleep and wake patterns for seven nights. Wakefulness could effectively be “transmitted” from one person to the other. Interestingly, bed partners received wake transmissions at a higher rate than the people diagnosed with insomnia.

One person’s insomnia can therefore become part of a two-person nighttime system.

The partner without diagnosed insomnia may begin waking in response to movement, getting into or out of bed, changes in breathing, light, phone use, tension, or the other person’s prolonged wakefulness. Over time, that partner may also start anticipating disruption.

The shared bed can become a place where both nervous systems remain alert.

A broad review of bed-sharing research reached a similarly nuanced conclusion: people may report better subjective sleep when sharing a bed even when certain objective sleep measurements appear worse. The authors also emphasized major gaps in the available research and the need to consider who is sharing the bed, why they are sharing it, the characteristics of the environment, and which sleep outcomes are being measured.

This is why confident internet declarations such as “couples always sleep better together” or “separate bedrooms save marriages” should make us cautious.

Both statements can be true for some couples.

Neither is a universal law.

Poor sleep does not stay in the bedroom

What appears consistently important is sleep quality itself.

Across two 14-day diary studies, poorer subjective sleep quality was associated with people reporting that they provided less support to their romantic partners. In some analyses, impaired sleep was also connected to receiving or perceiving less support.

Negative affect—feeling more irritable, distressed, or emotionally uncomfortable—helped explain part of the association.

Another study offers preliminary causal evidence for the same pattern.

Researchers randomly assigned 30 couples either to a night of total sleep deprivation or to a normal night of sleep. The following day, couples discussed a recurring relationship conflict.

Compared with rested couples, sleep-deprived partners showed less positive affect before and after the discussion. They also displayed higher cortisol levels during conflict.

This is not evidence that every morning disagreement is caused by sleep deprivation. Relationships are far more complicated than that.

But it does show why sleep cannot be dismissed as a private luxury.

The effects of a bad night can appear as:

• less patience;
• reduced perspective-taking;
• heightened emotional reactivity;
• a sharper response to ordinary frustration;
• less willingness to provide support;
• difficulty interpreting a partner generously;
• lower sexual interest;
• more criticism;
• more defensive conversations;
• and less energy for repair.

In plain English: the bed you insist on sharing may be producing the irritability you later interpret as a relationship problem.

I call the alternative “night sovereignty”

“Sleep divorce” is a catchy phrase, but I do not love it.

Divorce language makes a practical sleep decision sound like a miniature breakup. It frames the arrangement as a loss before the couple has even experienced it.

I prefer night sovereignty.

Night sovereignty means each person has legitimate authority over the conditions her body needs for sleep while remaining accountable for the emotional health of the relationship.

It is not:

“I will do whatever I want, and you are not allowed to react.”

It is:

“My body is not rejecting you, and your feelings are not an inconvenience. Let us design a night that respects both.”

This idea sits between two unhelpful extremes.

The first is fusion:

“If you love me, you must sleep exactly as I do.”

The second is detachment:

“My sleep is my problem, your feelings are yours, and no discussion is required.”

Night sovereignty says that autonomy and care can coexist.

You do not need to surrender every physical preference to prove closeness. But you also do not get to make a major change unilaterally and call your partner irrational for feeling hurt.

The power is in replacing obligation with consent.

When two people share a bed because they actively want to—not because they fear what separate sleep would “mean”—the shared nights can become more affectionate.

When they sleep apart, the decision can feel like intelligent care rather than exile.

What Your sleep conflict may actually be saying

Before buying another mattress or announcing a permanent move, translate the conflict.

A complaint about sleep often carries a biological need and an emotional fear at the same time.

The crucial shift is from:

accusation → information

“You are impossible to sleep beside” attacks identity.

“I wake four or five times when the room is noisy, and I am becoming depleted” describes information.

“You care more about sleep than you care about me” creates a loyalty contest.

“I am afraid separate rooms will reduce our closeness” reveals the real fear.

Once the actual problem has a name, the couple can work on it. Until then, they may continue fighting about blankets while the deeper conversation remains untouched.

Signs that sleeping separately may be worth trying

Separate sleep is not only for couples in crisis.

It can be a reasonable experiment whenever the shared arrangement repeatedly creates a predictable cost.

You might consider sleeping separately if:

• snoring, sleep talking, teeth grinding, alarms, or frequent movement repeatedly wake one partner;
• your work schedules require very different bedtimes or wake times;
• one person experiences insomnia and the other person’s movement increases nighttime alertness;
• chronic pain, pregnancy, perimenopause, menopause, illness, or recovery changes what the body needs;
• one partner requires a cold, silent, dark room while the other needs warmth, sound, or light;
• you need very different mattresses or levels of firmness;
• a baby, child, or dependent family member creates an unequal or rotating nighttime caregiving schedule;
• one person develops anticipatory anxiety before bed because she expects another disrupted night;
• sleep loss is spilling into irritability, criticism, reduced support, or morning conflict;
• travel or occasional solo nights consistently reveal a meaningful improvement in sleep;
• you remain affectionate and committed but are simply poor biological sleep partners.

That last possibility deserves more respect.

Two people can be emotionally compatible and sleep-incompatible.

We accept this distinction in almost every other area of life. You can love the same home but need different workspaces. You can share values but prefer different foods. You can be sexually connected and have different exercise rhythms.

Sleep does not need to be the final territory where difference is forbidden.

Separate sleep is not the same as emotional withdrawal

The physical fact—two bodies in two beds—does not tell you the emotional meaning of the arrangement.

One couple may sleep in separate rooms with tenderness. They kiss goodnight, spend time talking and touching, decide where intimacy will happen, and greet each other warmly in the morning.

Another couple may share a bed while using their phones in silence, avoiding sex, withholding affection, and facing opposite walls with years of resentment between them.

Which couple is closer?

Proximity is not intimacy.

It is only proximity.

A 2024 narrative review identified several pathways that may connect romantic relationships with sleep, including emotions, stress, felt security, perceived partner responsiveness, intimacy, self-regulation, presleep thoughts, and biological processes.

The relationship between sleep and closeness is therefore much richer than the number of inches between two pillows.

This is where couples can make a powerful mistake: they remove automatic closeness without replacing it with intentional closeness.

When the shared bed disappears, so may:

• the casual kiss;
• the late-night joke;
• the spontaneous touch;
• the ten-minute conversation in the dark;
• the moment of reassurance after a difficult day;
• and the unplanned initiation of sex.

Separate sleep is then blamed for a distance that actually came from losing rituals.

The solution is not necessarily to return to disrupted sleep.

It is to unbundle intimacy from unconsciousness.

You can cuddle before moving to another room. You can choose one room as the shared intimacy space without making it the mandatory sleep space. You can have sex when both people are awake enough to enjoy it rather than treating bedtime as the only doorway to intimacy.

You can drink coffee together in the morning, meet in one bed on weekend afternoons, or share selected nights when your schedules align.

The relationship needs contact.

It does not require eight consecutive hours of unconscious co-location every night.

Five sleeping arrangements that are not “all together” or “all apart”

Many couples imagine only two choices: share one bed forever or move permanently into separate rooms.

That false binary creates unnecessary fear.

Sleep can be designed with far more flexibility.

The best model may change across seasons.

A couple can sleep together for years, separate during a difficult pregnancy, reunite afterward, separate again during shift work, and adopt a hybrid arrangement later in life.

Flexibility is not failure.

It is responsiveness.

I would be wary of any rule that says mature love must look identical at 28, 42, 57, and 73.

Bodies change. Hormones change. Health changes. Work changes. Responsibilities change.

The architecture of care should be allowed to change too.

How to ask for separate sleep without making Your partner feel discarded

Do not introduce the idea during a 2:00 a.m. argument after being kicked, awakened, overheated, or pushed to the edge of the mattress.

At that hour, the nervous system is prepared for defense—not collaborative design.

Choose a neutral daytime moment.

Then lead with the shared goal rather than the escape plan.

You might say:

“I love being close to you, and I do not want this to sound like rejection. I have noticed that I am waking repeatedly and becoming less patient during the day. I want us to test a sleep arrangement that protects both my rest and our closeness. Could we design a two-week experiment together?”

That wording accomplishes several important things.

It affirms love. It describes an observable problem. It avoids blaming the partner’s identity. It proposes a trial instead of announcing an irreversible verdict. It also makes intimacy part of the plan rather than an afterthought.

If your partner becomes hurt, do not rush to prove that the hurt is illogical.

The request may have touched an old wound.

Ask:

“What are you afraid this will change between us?”

The answer may be:

• sex;
• morning affection;
• physical safety;
• emotional reassurance;
• social embarrassment;
• abandonment;
• or fear that a temporary arrangement will become permanent.

Once you know the fear, you can address it directly.

Vague reassurance—“Nothing will change”—is unlikely to feel convincing because something will change.

Offer concrete protection instead:

• “We will still spend the first 30 minutes in bed together.”
• “We will choose three shared nights this week.”
• “I will come and say goodnight rather than disappearing.”
• “Let us plan intimacy when neither of us is exhausted.”
• “We will review this after 14 nights.”
• “Either of us can raise concerns before the review.”
• “This is an experiment, not a punishment or a hidden breakup.”

I also recommend avoiding the phrase:

“You keep me awake.”

Even when technically true, it can turn an involuntary body function into a character indictment.

Try:

“The current setup is not giving me continuous sleep.”

The first sentence identifies a culprit.

The second identifies a system you can redesign together.

The 14-night night-sovereignty experiment

Do not judge a new arrangement after one awkward night.

Novelty itself can disturb sleep. The first separate night may bring sadness, relief, guilt, freedom, loneliness, luxury—or all of them at once.

A structured trial gives the couple enough information to evaluate the actual effect.

This is not a clinical sleep study, and the scores are not a diagnosis.

Their purpose is to move the conversation from symbolism to lived experience.

Review more than the number of hours slept.

Ask:

• Did either person wake fewer times?
• Did you fall asleep more easily?
• Was morning resentment lower?
• Did you have more patience during ordinary stress?
• Did affection become more deliberate or disappear?
• Did sexual desire improve with greater energy?
• Did reduced opportunity cause sexual contact to decline?
• Did either person feel lonely, punished, relieved, safer, or more like herself?
• Did you miss the person or simply miss the familiar routine?
• Was the new arrangement practical enough to sustain?
• Did one person receive better rest while the other carried a new emotional burden?

The goal is not to “win” the experiment.

The partner who requested separate sleep should not treat improved rest as proof that the other person’s feelings do not matter. The hesitant partner should not treat one lonely evening as proof that the arrangement is inherently damaging.

Both forms of information belong in the decision.

At the end of the experiment, create one sentence that defines the purpose of your arrangement.

For example:

“We sleep separately on work nights so that we can be kinder and more present when we are awake.”

That sentence protects the decision from other people’s assumptions—and from your own fears on a vulnerable day.

How to protect sex and affection when You do not share every night

The fear that separate bedrooms will end a sexual relationship is not foolish.

A shared bed creates opportunity. Without it, intimacy may require more intention, and some couples experience planned desire as less romantic.

But automatic opportunity is not the same as satisfying intimacy.

Exhaustion, pressure, resentment, and the dread of another broken night can also suppress desire. A well-rested person may have more capacity for touch, playfulness, curiosity, and sexual interest.

The real task is to prevent sleep separation from becoming touch separation.

Try separating three experiences that couples often bundle together.

1. Connection

Connection includes talking, laughing, emotional disclosure, attention, and feeling known.

2. Affection

Affection includes kissing, cuddling, massage, warmth, and nonsexual touch.

3. Sleep

Sleep is an unconscious biological state requiring particular physical and neurological conditions.

These experiences can overlap, but they do not have to occupy the same hours or the same bed.

Create a “bridge ritual” between daytime partnership and separate sleep.

It might be:

• a ten-minute cuddle;
• tea on the sofa;
• a shared shower;
• a kiss in the doorway;
• talking in one bed before separating;
• one partner reading beside the other;
• choosing clothes for the following day together;
• or a simple, deliberate goodnight.

Keep the ritual easy enough to survive busy days.

Its purpose is to communicate:

“We are separating for sleep, not withdrawing love.”

For sex, expand the map.

Intimacy can happen before the most exhausted hour of the day. It can happen in either room, on weekend mornings, during an afternoon with privacy, or as part of a protected date.

Scheduling intimacy does not make desire fake.

It makes space for desire in a life that already schedules work, childcare, medication, meals, exercise, and almost everything else considered important.

When separate bedrooms are the wrong solution

Separate sleep can be healthy, but it can also be misused.

It is not a healthy solution when one person uses it to punish, control, frighten, or force compliance.

“Agree with me or I will not sleep beside you” turns distance into a weapon.

It is also concerning when someone disappears into another room without discussion, refuses all affection, or uses sleep as a respectable cover for avoiding a relationship crisis.

Pay attention if the move follows:

• betrayal;
• escalating hostility;
• sexual pain;
• contempt;
• fear;
• coercion;
• unexplained secrecy;
• or a sudden loss of emotional engagement.

The separate room may not be causing the distance. It may be evidence of distance that needs direct attention.

In that situation, better sleep can still be useful. But it should not replace an honest conversation, medical support, or relationship therapy.

The arrangement also deserves reconsideration if:

• one partner consistently feels lonely and the other dismisses it;
• physical intimacy disappears despite repeated attempts to discuss it;
• separate rooms become a way to avoid all difficult conversations;
• one partner makes the decision without negotiation;
• the arrangement intensifies anxiety instead of improving rest;
• or the practical setup is deeply unequal.

One person should not receive a private, comfortable bedroom while the other is permanently relegated to an uncomfortable sofa.

Healthy separate sleep is negotiated.

Punitive separate sleep is imposed.

The gendered question hiding inside the bedroom

For many women, “sharing every night” is not only about sleep.

It can become another place where she is expected to absorb discomfort quietly so nobody else has to feel rejected.

She tolerates the snoring. She manages the baby’s waking. She wears earplugs but still listens for the child. She changes the temperature, gives up the blanket, silences her alarm, goes to bed earlier than her body wants, or stays awake later than she needs.

Then she performs warmth in the morning because naming her exhaustion would create one more emotional task.

This pattern is not present in every heterosexual relationship, and nighttime disruption can burden people of every gender.

But women are frequently socialized to protect relational harmony and to translate even a basic boundary into the gentlest possible language.

The result is that a biological need—sleep—can begin to feel selfish.

It is not selfish to need uninterrupted rest.

It is also not loving to demand that another person repeatedly sacrifice her sleep so you can avoid confronting what separate bedrooms symbolize to you.

The powerful sentence here is not:

“I should be able to sleep wherever I want.”

That sentence is technically assertive but emotionally incomplete.

The more relational and courageous sentence is:

“My need for sleep belongs inside our definition of care.”

It does not dismiss the partner.

It refuses to dismiss the self.

Do not let a separate room hide a treatable sleep disorder

Changing rooms can reduce disruption, but it does not diagnose or treat the underlying cause.

Loud habitual snoring, witnessed pauses in breathing, choking or gasping during sleep, and excessive daytime sleepiness can be symptoms of sleep apnea.

The U.S. National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute advises speaking with a healthcare provider when snoring or gasping is reported or symptoms of poor sleep persist.

Separate rooms may allow the other person to sleep, but they do not make possible breathing interruptions harmless.

Persistent insomnia also deserves more than endless household improvisation.

Evidence-based behavioral and psychological treatments are available. The American Academy of Sleep Medicine recommends multicomponent cognitive behavioral therapy for insomnia, or CBT-I, for adults with chronic insomnia.

Separate sleep may protect the bed partner and temporarily reduce environmental triggers. It should not become a reason to postpone evaluation.

Seek professional guidance when sleep problems:

• happen frequently;
• last for months;
• impair daytime functioning;
• create dangerous sleepiness;
• involve changes in breathing;
• include unusual movements or behaviors;
• or remain severe despite improving the sleep environment.

A qualified clinician can help distinguish a relationship-environment problem from insomnia, sleep apnea, restless legs syndrome, parasomnia, medication effects, hormonal changes, chronic pain, or another health condition.

The relationship is what happens when You are awake

There is something quietly radical about a couple choosing a private arrangement that serves them better than a public symbol.

No neighbor sees the patience restored by an uninterrupted night.

No relative sees that the morning arguments have stopped.

No friend sees the deliberate goodnight kiss, the warmer sex life, the return of humor, or the relief of no longer failing at a version of closeness that never suited your bodies.

People may see only two bedrooms.

Let them.

The strength of a relationship cannot be reliably measured by its nighttime floor plan.

It is measured in:

• responsiveness;
• honesty;
• emotional and physical safety;
• repair;
• desire;
• fairness;
• shared responsibility;
• respect;
• and the freedom to tell the truth about what your body needs.

Sharing a life does not require sharing every meal, every hobby, every thought, every account, every mood, or every night.

Love is not proven by reducing two people into one set of preferences.

Mature love makes room for difference without interpreting difference as departure.

If sleeping separately helps you return to one another more rested, generous, and alive, the distance between beds may not be the distance growing between you.

It may be the space in which resentment finally stops growing.

If you discover that you genuinely sleep and feel better together, that is valuable too.

The point is not separation.

The point is choice.

A shared bed can be beautiful. A freely chosen shared bed is even more beautiful. And a relationship strong enough to redesign the night is not less intimate—it may be more honest.

Editorial note: This article is intended for educational purposes and does not replace individualized medical, psychological, or relationship care.

Related posts You’ll love

• Lofi vs white noise: The surprising winner for calm, focus, and sleep [2026 guide with FREE PDF!]
• 20 affirmations to calm anxiety before bedtime: A complete guide to nightly peace and restful sleep
• The fairness reset: 7 couples exercises to fix money imbalance without fighting
• 7 quiet social practices for Women who want company but not conversation (FREE PDF)
• Why hyper-connected Women still need deeper quiet: The calm space We’re missing in a noisy digital world
• How to stop making Your needs sound small: Name what You need
  

FAQ

Sources and inspirations

• Andre, C. J., Lovallo, V., & Spencer, R. M. C. (2021). The effects of bed sharing on sleep: From partners to pets. Sleep Health.
• Cernadas Curotto, P., Sterpenich, V., Sander, D., Favez, N., Rimmele, U., & Klimecki, O. (2022). Quarreling after a sleepless night: Preliminary evidence of the impact of sleep deprivation on interpersonal conflict. Affective Science.
• Drews, H. J., Wallot, S., Brysch, P., Berger-Johannsen, H., Weinhold, S. L., Mitkidis, P., Baier, P. C., Lechinger, J., Roepstorff, A., & Göder, R. (2020). Bed-sharing in couples is associated with increased and stabilized REM sleep and sleep-stage synchronization. Frontiers in Psychiatry.
• Edinger, J. D., Arnedt, J. T., Bertisch, S. M., Carney, C. E., Harrington, J. J., Lichstein, K. L., Sateia, M. J., Troxel, W. M., Zhou, E. S., Kazmi, U., Heald, J. L., & Martin, J. L. (2021). Behavioral and psychological treatments for chronic insomnia disorder in adults: An American Academy of Sleep Medicine clinical practice guideline. Journal of Clinical Sleep Medicine.
• Elsey, T., Keller, P. S., & El-Sheikh, M. (2019). The role of couple sleep concordance in sleep quality: Attachment as a moderator of associations. Journal of Sleep Research.
• National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute. (2025, January 9). What is sleep apnea? U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, National Institutes of Health.
• Sell, N. T., Sisson, N. M., Gordon, A. M., Stanton, S. C. E., & Impett, E. A. (2023). Daily sleep quality and support in romantic relationships: The role of negative affect and perspective-taking. Affective Science.
• Walters, E. M., Phillips, A. J. K., Mellor, A., Hamill, K., Jenkins, M. M., Norton, P. J., Baucom, D. H., & Drummond, S. P. A. (2020). Sleep and wake are shared and transmitted between individuals with insomnia and their bed-sharing partners. Sleep.
• Wang, X. X., Lin, Q., Liu, X., Dong, P., Bao, Y., Que, J.-Y., Lu, L., Wei, Y. B., & Liu, J. J. (2025). The association between couple relationships and sleep: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Sleep Medicine Reviews.
• Xie, Y., & Feeney, B. C. (2024). A narrative review of mechanisms linking romantic relationship experiences to sleep quality. Sleep Advances.